Energy Transition Now - Episode 11 with Kentaro Hosomi
One of the key technologies that could play a vital – if not essential – role in making net-zero emissions by mid-century possible is carbon capture utilisation and storage; CCUS. This week, Kentaro Hosomi of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) joins the podcast for Episode 11 and speaks to the importance of technology and innovation in decarbonising our economies and the potential for CCUS.
Kentaro explains how MHI is helping its customers to decarbonise, and more broadly, the global economy. Kentaro discusses how MHI are doing this, through a range of technological solutions such as carbon capture, particularly with industries with hard to abate carbon emissions. An example of this being the largest being a coal-fired plant in the United States, which is as of today, the largest single carbon capture plant in the world, using MHI technology.
Kentaro Hosomi, Chief Regional Officer (CRO) EMEA, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, and CEO Mitsubishi Heavy Industries EMEA
Kentaro Hosomi is Executive Vice President at Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) and as of 1 April 2021 also serves as Chief Regional Officer (CRO) for the Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA) region and CEO Mitsubishi Heavy Industries EMEA, Ltd. In his current role, Mr. Hosomi leads MHI’s efforts to grow its business across the region and across MHI Group companies, including Mitsubishi Power, Mitsubishi Logisnext, Primetals Technologies and MHI Air-conditioning Europe.
He previously served as President & CEO for the company’s Energy Systems domain and was deeply involved in MHI Group’s energy transition strategy. Mr. Hosomi is also a member of the board for Vestas Wind Systems where MHI now holds a stake in.
Mr. Hosomi brings around 40 years of experience to MHI Group, and has a proven track record in the power and energy sector.
In 2011, Mr. Hosomi was appointed as General Manager of Business Development & Strategic Planning Department of Power Systems at MHI, where he was responsible for business development, strategic planning, alliances for the overall power systems business. There, he made achievements such as the acquisition of PW Power Systems (currently known as Mitsubishi Power Aero LLC) and the launch of Savannah Machinery Works in Georgia, USA (now operating under Mitsubishi Power).
Mr. Hosomi’s expertise in sales, marketing and commercial administration of various types of power plant projects contributed to the company’s global presence in the energy industry. Starting as a sales specialist for the Middle East and later on doing a five-year stint in London, UK, his career at MHI Group includes a track record worth a few decades of winning, executing and managing power plant projects successfully.
Mr. Hosomi earned his Bachelor’s degree in economics from The University of Tokyo, Japan.
David Linden: Hello, everyone. I’m your host, David Linden, the head of energy transition for the Westwood Global Energy Group. And you’re listening to Energy Transition Now where we discuss what the transition really means for the oil and gas and the broader energy industry. In our last episode, we spoke about the importance of technology and innovation in decarbonizing our economies. One of the technologies that could play a vital – if not essential – role in making net-zero emissions by mid-century possible is carbon capture utilisation and storage: CCUS. To talk to us about the potential for CCUS, I have the real pleasure of having Kentaro Hosomi of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, MHI Group, as my guest today. Ken brings over 40 years of experience to the MHI group with a focus on the power and energy sector. He is currently an executive vice president at MHI and serves as the Chief Regional Officer, a CRO, for the EMEA region, and is also the CEO of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries EMEA. In these roles, he leads MHI’s efforts to grow its business across the region and across MHI group companies. He previously served as the President and CEO of the company’s energy systems domain and was deeply involved in MHI Group’s energy transition strategy. He is also a member of the Board for Vestas Wind Systems, where MHI holds a stake. Ken, it’s great to have you on the podcast today. I very much look forward to our discussion.
Kentaro Hosomi: Thank you very much for your introduction.
David Linden: Absolute pleasure. Now, let’s get into the questions, what we’re really here for, I guess. You know, MHI is a very significant industrial group. You’ve got global operations, 80,000 employees, you had four trillion yen of revenue, etc. But can you maybe just talk to us a little bit around how MHI is helping to decarbonize its customers or more broadly, even the global economy?
Kentaro Hosomi: Thank you very much. I’d like to say first that MHI has through its history, had a very broad portfolio of technology solutions. Carbon capture is one of the technologies we are leading the world with. But also together, we have invested quite a few amounts in developing hydrogen as an alternative fuel before that. And also, we are already implementing measures like waste heat recovery, those will help the industry to decarbonize. And those through those technologies we are sort of focusing ourselves in this energy transition, mainly on the decarbonization of the industries, which are really hard to abate such kind of carbon emissions. So, into these technologies, I think we can contribute to will reach the net-zero or carbon neutral world.
David Linden: Well, thank you. Yes. Now I had had a look through your medium-term strategy, and I could see that things like hydrogen do play a very big role. Then maybe we’ll have to come get you back on again to talk about hydrogen another time, but we’re here to talk about CCS. So, you know the key question I would have for you, you know, of all the different technologies that are out there? Why have a focus on CSS? What’s driving that for MHI?
Kentaro Hosomi: Looking at the world, as I said, there are many industries which currently still need those products in order for the world to develop, such as in steel or cement, aluminum, fertilizers, these kinds of industries. These are essential for our daily lives and for the development of the world in its entirety. So, these industries, as of today, heavily rely on fossil fuel for their process, the production process of those kind of products. And as of today, the available looking at available technologies – of course, in the future, as I said, replacing such kind of fossil fuel with hydrogen, these kinds of things, this could come into the picture – but as of today, what we need to do is to reduce and eliminate the carbon emissions from those kinds of approaches. And there I think the carbon capture technology is going to play a very significant role in those kinds of industries.
David Linden: And just so I maybe understand, are you saying that it’s a choice between hydrogen and CCS or you saying CCS is something that can be done now and maybe hydrogen later?
Kentaro Hosomi: Yes, CCS is a technology we can apply now. And of course, this CCS also works in the production, in the process of producing hydrogen, as well as you know, cracking the fossil fuel and separating the CO2 will make hydrogen. So, this sort of technology will not only serve as the carbon capture from the existing industries today, but also it will work in the future in the process of producing hydrogen as well.
David Linden: Very interesting. Okay. So, it’s kind of an enabler for the hydrogen economy as well. Very interesting. OK. So yes, we started to get into a little bit around how CCS works and those things that actually there’s a few good videos on your website as well, actually, that you have to work through the process. But can you maybe just talk us through a little bit about what solutions are available or need to be developed?
Kentaro Hosomi: Basically, our carbon capture technology is based on a sort of, a solvent liquid and absorbs the CO2, the carbon dioxide from the exhaust gas of such kind of process. This is basically our technology and for that any industry which is burning the fossil fuel and emitting the exhaust gas, this can be applied. So, as I said, the hard to abate industries like steel or cement, these kind of tech industries can benefit from all of that. Of course, first, it was used on thermal power stations. This is the start of our technology, but also now the application is spreading to those like, you know, the shipping where we can, we are developing a more, modulised technology for capturing carbon from the shipping emissions, so there are various applications based on our technology as of today. I would say, readily available as of today.
David Linden: OK, and just for clarity, then for folks who maybe don’t or haven’t come across CSS before, you talked about MHI having a solvent liquid kind of a solution. Is that the approach that everybody else takes as well or is what you’re doing unique?
Kentaro Hosomi: There are various approaches to carbon capture and utilise instances and technologies. But this is this whole technology we have already been doing for 30, more than 30 years, and we have already many projects in the world which have applied a such kind of approach. The largest being to a coal-fired plant in the United States, which is with these, as of today, the largest single carbon capture plant in the world
David Linden: And that uses MHI technology?
Kentaro Hosomi: Yeah, that’s right.
David Linden: Yes, very interesting. In terms of, so, we’ve talked about certainly I talk to a number of clients about CSS and its readiness and its applicability and certainly, you know, some of them are baffled. Should I say that, why hasn’t CSS already been deployed so much? Know there’s clearly a driver here, which is about decarbonization. I’m happy to hear if there’s more to consider here than just that, but there must be some barriers to its deployment as well, whether it be technical or commercial. Could you maybe just sort of allude to some of those and help us understand why we haven’t all got CCS on all of our industries right now?
Kentaro Hosomi: One of the challenges of the carbon capture is that eventually the captured carbon dioxide has to be stored or utilized. And of course, we are also working on the R&D activities for utilization of captured carbon dioxide. At this moment. At the most, I would say viable solution would be to store the storage, the capture of carbon capture. So, in terms of that, there were, I think, was a little bit difficult in finding proper storage areas. That was one of the challenges we had. But looking at, for example, in the UK right now, the UK government is promoting the storage into the depleted oil and gas fields in the North Sea. As you already know, there’s the UK government is encouraging the industry to form clusters and basically those emissions will be captured and transported and stored in the North Sea. That is the whole plan, and such sort of initiatives is breaking through, such is one way to break through those kinds of challenges. One other thing about the challenge is that the, of course, the CO2 itself, unless so we find a way to utilize that, it has doesn’t have any commercial value in that sense. So, it means that this possibility of capturing CO2, it is a sort of some kind of an addition to, you know, the of the production facilities for that. So that kind of capital investment. This has been a challenge, but also in that sense, the UK government is introducing some, I believe, is some measures to facilitate such kind of carbon capture and storage scheme. So, we’re expecting that this kind of a scheme would help ease, you know, the investment into such kind of carbon capture facilities. And this will also help this carbon capture to be more obviously applicable to many industries.
David Linden: Very interesting. Thank you. Yes, I mean, there was some interesting things in there that you talked about a little bit earlier as well around. Maybe some of the technical constraints, so you talked about modularization to make this work elsewhere. Just so I understand. So, the technology’s kind of ready, but you maybe need to do things like modernization to, I don’t know, reduce cost and actually make it technically feasible if that’s fair in different industries. Am I interpreting that correctly?
Kentaro Hosomi: Yes. Of course, we also on our side as the producers of such kind of carbon capture systems, we are trying to drive the cost down, and one way we are setting is that we are improving our solvents so that making it more effective, meaning that we can make you know, the facility smaller than the previous cases to capture the CO2 with more efficient solvent. This is one way, and we are already testing such kind of new solvents in places like Mongstad, Norway, where we are getting very good results of those kind of efficiency. This is one way. And also, the other thing is that there are many smaller industries and applications which needs carbon capture like, for example, waste to energy plants. These are much more smaller industries which also need such kind of carbon capture technologies. And for those smaller, we are developing modular sort of solutions for such kind of small applications, smaller applications so that in order to capture CO2 from such kind of smaller installation, we can also multiply such kind of modular application modular solutions in order to solve such kind of issues of such smaller emitters.
David Linden: Very interesting. Very interesting indeed. A question that often gets asked can, is that and maybe this is the criticism that levelled, you know, because you’re at the intersection of the CCS and the hydrogen economy, as I can see. There is a question that is often asked around whether sufficient carbon is captured when, for example, producing blue hydrogen. And, you know, old studies have shown that it’s less than 90 percent and so forth. And there’s been a lot of, I don’t know if you follow your LinkedIn feed or anything like that, but there’s a lot of chatter on LinkedIn and other places that it isn’t good enough the carbon capture technology, for blue hydrogen in that sense. What would you say in response to that? Because you’re clearly working on the latest technology associated with that.
Kentaro Hosomi: With our technology, we are always making for, going for more than 90 percent of carbon capture from the flue gas, from such kind of data. So, I think, yes, looking at the technology as of today, we think that this is contributes significantly to reducing the carbon emissions from the existing industries. Of course, there will need to be further that there is room for further innovation in the future and we will not stop here. We will always try to improve our technology and make it progress through various projects. But in order to do so, we need to work with many partners. I would say, especially the emitters or those who are responsible for transport and storage of such kind of carbon captured carbon. We cannot. We have to turn this whole, I would say carbon circulation or carbon cycle, into a more effective and more economical so everybody can use such kind of thing. So, this is where we see a very strong need for partnering with our various stakeholders in this circulation. So, in order to move this technology forward to be more efficient, I think that is the status of today.
David Linden: Perfect Ken, I appreciate that, thank you. And people often forget that things get better, rather than worse, that’s technology and progress. But that’s good to hear that you’re working on that. And maybe that’s a good way to sort of come to the question I wanted to ask you around, sort of, I guess, call it building a business case. But there are a number of things you’ve talked about here, whether it’s about smaller industries or clusters and the concept of the lack of commercial value and how you’re working through that and what governments need to do. What is it actually, in simple terms, maybe what is it that is needed to make a CCS project actually work?
Kentaro Hosomi: I think one of the most significant parts is a government policy or support in such kind of, building of the whole value chain of carbon capture and usage and storage. So is that I think in order to for the industry to move one step forward, I think some kind of incentives this is required not only on the capex side, but also this carbon capture facility is in order to recover, such kind of investment for the carbon capture facility needs some kind of predictability that this carbon capture business will run for a certain period of time. In order to ensure such kind of a certain business for the carbon capture that some kind of predictability in the business. This, I think the government has, I would say, governments will have to play a significant role in such kind of creating such kind of predictability.
David Linden: I can see that and that’s often something, you know, projects I’ve worked on myself. It’s a similar sort of question, is it… It looks fine, but you need the government incentive to either create a commercial value. And how do you do that? And many models for achieving that, and I guess the UK’s got one approach to that. If you’re thinking about a project, though, what are some of the other challenges that you can come through in a business case? I don’t mean, it’s a challenge in itself, but what is it you need to prove in a business case? So, I’m thinking things like you talked about a cluster, why is clustering good? Is that because that’s where you get a high concentration and a longer-term supply, should we call it? Of course. And that’s, that’s reason why people are choosing clusters, or it was there other reasons that could go, you know, to justify why you would do CCS in that particular place?
Kentaro Hosomi: I think the clusters means that the flue gas from each emitter is different, so we need a sort of different solutions for each of these emitters. So that’s why I mentioned about the modular approach. This could be a better approach, a better solution for such kind of different emitters. And the one thing that isn’t a plus there are the all the UK government is going for cluster is that this is as I mentioned earlier, the challenge was transportation storage in a very efficient and physically acceptable way. This was one of the challenges of this carbon capture being commercialized. So, in that sense, the transportation to make this transportation and storage in an economical and affordable way, it is good that this kind of emissions will be gathered as a cluster and will be treated in a single source. This is a sort of the idea behind clusters being more effective economically.
David Linden: OK, that’s very clear. Now that makes a lot of sense. So, in a cluster, you’ve got different, as you say, modular solutions for the different emitters. And then you’re trying to be as close to transport reduce the transportation and the storage costs to make that, as you say, economic.
Kentaro Hosomi: Yes, exactly. Yes.
David Linden: Makes a lot of sense. OK. Very interesting indeed. OK. So, I mean, look, MHI in itself is clearly, as you talked about, you had one of the first or the biggest, should I say, carbon capture storage plants on thermal power out in the US. And you’ve mentioned a few other examples of where you have succeeded. Could you maybe talk us through a few other examples of where this technology is proved particularly interesting or successful?
Kentaro Hosomi: I think what we are developing with other partners right now is also the way not only storage, but the utilization of the captured CO2. I think we eventually need such kind of solutions. It’s because physically, you know, the storage places could come to some kind of limit in the very long future. But if we can use the captured CO2, this is also one way of solving that issue. So, in that sense, we are making such kind of a joint development efforts with other companies for the utilization of the captured CO2. So, things like changing into a sort of an alternative fuel synthesizing with other elements and producing synthesized fuels like methanol. Methanol, this is one of the things which we are trying to develop. And there are various solutions, which we are also looking into to utilize such kind of captured CO2. Yes, there is the technology improvement will take us, I think, to a new dimension for such kind of CO2 technology, CO2 value chain.
David Linden: Yes, ideally, we end up trying to use some of the carbon as well in various industries, and we certainly see quite a few new industries popping up. You can now buy whether it’s building materials or others that ultimately take carbon from the air and or directly from an industrial plant and use that to make other materials. Okay, wonderful. I mean, where do you see the future, of CCS growing and your future? So, the focus we’ve talked about all the different industries, but where is the sort of the biggest of the needs and the future focus being needing to be?
Kentaro Hosomi: Yes, looking at the world and the world as a whole is heading for carbon neutral in 2050. So, this is the sort of, I would say, the consensus of the global consensus for our target. One thing is, I think one way in achieving that kind of carbon neutral world is through the use of renewable energies and electrification through renewable energy. So, this is obviously a very effective way in the way towards carbon neutral. However, looking globally, there are not all the areas geographically are blessed with such kind of conditions to make the renewable energy competitive. There are places where the wind is not so strong that the source of the sunshine is limited. These are looking globally, there are places like that, and also those are the areas which are relatively heavily populated, and they need further growth in the economies like the Asian countries or African countries, these places. And so, in order to grow economically and that at the same time, not emitting carbon dioxide like the Western world has been doing for years. For those kinds of areas, I think this this carbon capture technology is indispensable for the economic growth and prosperity of such kind of countries. So yes, the movement will start from Europe or UK in these countries. But I think globally we need such kind of technology to be spread over the world in order to realize, you know, the economic prosperity and decarbonization at the same time.
David Linden: Absolutely. Thank you. No certainly, I think any credible climate scenario recognizes that, you know, the capture and removal of CO2 from the atmosphere is absolutely fundamental to making net-zero as such possible. Wonderful. OK, Ken, thank you. We have run out of time, as is always the problem with these things. It’s been really great to have your views on the future role of CCUS, including, I guess, that all important business case. How is it going to work going forward? So. Thanks. Thanks for sharing.
Kentaro Hosomi: Thank you very much.
David Linden: I appreciate your insights.
Kentaro Hosomi: Yes. Thank you very much, David.
David Linden: I much appreciate it Ken, and thanks everyone for listening as well. Hope you enjoyed it. Please make sure you subscribe. Give us a great rating and share with your friends and talk to you next time.
Copyright and Reproduction
This website contains material which is owned by or licensed to Westwood Global Energy Group. This material includes, but is not limited to, the design, layout, look, appearance and graphics. You may not modify, reproduce or distribute the content, design or layout of the Website, or individual sections of the content, design or layout of the Website, without our express prior written permission. For media enquiries, please contact email@example.com
Sign-up to receive alerts of new podcast episodes and the latest Energy Transition Insights newsletter
Episodes coming soon!
Executive Director, Geothermal Entrepreneurship Organization (GEO)